The original intent of the Brown Act Cure Letter was supported by all of the 12 co-signers. The intent of the letters was to get the City to produce documents about their library meetings and to determine if there were, in fact, any Brown Act violations.
Many people in the community believed the Santa Clarita City Council had made their decision about library services before the August 24 2010 vote.
After the group sent the letter, the City finally produced some of the documents from various public record requests, but most of the requested documents were not produced until the City signed the contract with LSSI.
All 12 of the original signers of the Brown Act Cure letter — and thousands more in the community — are concerned about the City’s lack of transparency and community involvement in this decision, as well as in other actions. Many of the letter-signers and others in the community will continue to meet and ask questions about the library. A steering committee is being formed to coordinate meetings about the library issue and other transparency issues as well.
Most of the original 12 signers have decided not to pursue further legal action against the City of Santa Clarita as a group; but one individual from the group, Edward Shain, has decided to carry on. His attorney, Don Ricketts, filed suit today. The suit asks for a declaration that Library Resolution 10-71, passed by City Council on August 24, 2010, and the contract between the City of Santa Clarita and LSSI, dated October 18, 2010, be declared null and void.
Also see:
Valencia Library Patron Files Lawsuit Against City Alleging Brown Act Violation by Christopher Glotfelty at KHTS.